Super Glue Was Discovered Twice by the Same Man, and He Threw It Out Both Times

US2768109 was filed by Harry Wesley Coover Jr. on June 2, 1954, under a title that gives away nothing: Alcohol-catalyzed alpha-cyanoacrylate adhesive compositions. The product is super glue, and the history behind the filing is a good demonstration of how hard it can be to recognize a discovery when it is standing in front of you.

Coover found the compound twice, nine years apart, and the first time he threw it away.

1942: the gun sights

During the Second World War, Coover was working at Eastman Kodak on a project to produce clear plastic gun sights. The team was evaluating a family of compounds called cyanoacrylates, hoping one would form a suitably transparent optical plastic.

The cyanoacrylates were useless for the purpose. They stuck to everything they touched. Every piece of equipment they contacted was ruined, samples bonded to their containers, and the material could not be worked with in any normal laboratory sense.

The project rejected them. From the standpoint of building a gun sight, this is entirely correct, and it is worth saying plainly that the decision was not stupid. They needed a clear plastic. They had a substance that destroyed lab glassware.

1951: the jet canopies

Nine years later, Coover was supervising work at a Kodak facility in Tennessee on heat-resistant polymers for jet aircraft canopies. A researcher on the project, Fred Joyner, spread a film of ethyl cyanoacrylate between the two prisms of a refractometer to measure its refractive index.

The prisms bonded permanently. The instrument was expensive and it was finished.

This time Coover understood what he was looking at. The compound did not need heat. It did not need pressure. It did not need a catalyst added by the user. It simply bonded, instantly, under ordinary conditions.

Why it works

The mechanism is why the material kept ruining equipment, and it is the actual content of the patent.

Cyanoacrylate monomers polymerize on contact with trace moisture. Hydroxide ions in even a very thin film of water initiate the reaction, the monomers link into long chains almost immediately, and the chains lock the two surfaces together.

The important consequence is that there is enough water for this on nearly every surface in a normal room, including your skin, laboratory glass, and the air-exposed face of a refractometer prism. The glue does not need you to do anything. The conditions are already present, which is exactly why it was such a nuisance to a team trying to do something else.

This also explains the familiar behaviors. A thin layer bonds better than a thick one, because the reaction starts at the moist surfaces and a thick bead leaves an unreacted middle. And the bottle survives on the shelf because it is sealed away from humidity, with the formulation stabilized to keep it from setting on its own.

Coover's patent covers the compositions and the use of an alcohol catalyst in producing them, which is the piece that made the material manufacturable rather than merely interesting.

Sold, and then used for something else

Kodak brought it to market in 1958, initially under the name Eastman 910. Coover appeared on the television program I've Got a Secret in 1959 and lifted the host off the ground on a single drop of it applied between two steel cylinders, which was a genuinely effective demonstration.

The application that mattered most was medical. A cyanoacrylate formulation was used to close wounds, and it was carried in Vietnam, where sprayed onto a serious bleeding injury it could hold a wound closed long enough to get a soldier to a surgeon. The exact scope of battlefield use is described differently in different accounts, but the underlying property is not in dispute, and cyanoacrylate surgical adhesives are standard equipment today.

Coover eventually held 460 patents and received the National Medal of Technology and Innovation in 2010. He said more than once that the thing he was proudest of was the medical use, and he was reportedly untroubled by the fact that he had thrown the discovery away the first time.

The compound's defining property never changed across the whole story. It sticks to everything. Only the question changed, from what is wrong with this to what is it for.

See the original

The full text and figures of US2768109 are on patents.us.