The Patent for Birthing a Baby by Centrifugal Force
In 1965, a New York couple named George and Charlotte Blonsky received a US patent for a machine that spun a woman in labor on a rotating turntable, using centrifugal force to deliver the child. They were entirely sincere. They had detailed engineering drawings.
US3216423 was filed on November 9, 1962, and granted three years later, on November 9, 1965. The applicants are listed as George B. Blonsky and Charlotte E. Blonsky, both of New York City. The title is "Apparatus for Facilitating the Birth of a Child by Centrifugal Force."
The patent runs six pages and includes seven sheets of detailed mechanical drawings. The premise, stated in the opening paragraphs, is that modern women — described by the Blonskys as "civilized women, who often do not have the opportunity to develop the muscles needed in giving birth" — could benefit from mechanical assistance in delivery. The mechanical assistance proposed is a large rotating turntable, on which the woman in labor would lie flat, head toward the center, feet toward the rim. Restraints would secure her in place. The turntable would then spin.
Centrifugal force, the Blonskys explain in careful prose, would assist the contractions by pulling the child outward toward the rim of the turntable, where, upon delivery, it would be caught by a stretched cloth net positioned around the outside perimeter. A small motor and gearing mechanism would allow the operator to adjust the speed. The patent specifies a maximum recommended rotation of approximately 82 RPM, generating roughly 7G of centrifugal force at the mother's pelvis.
How sincere it was
The Blonskys appear to have been entirely sincere. George Blonsky was a mining engineer who had emigrated from Greece; Charlotte was his wife, listed as co-inventor in keeping with their joint development of the idea over several years. They had no children of their own — the patent file notes this — and had developed the apparatus, by their account, after observing animal births in which the natural forces involved seemed mechanically advantageous in ways human anatomy did not preserve.
The patent application was reviewed by examiner Lawrence W. Trapp, who, finding no prior art on the specific question of childbirth-by-centrifuge, granted it. The device was never built. No medical institution showed interest. Obstetric anesthesia and the post-war boom in hospital-based delivery had already made the problem the Blonskys were trying to solve — the mechanical difficulty of unassisted delivery — increasingly moot.
The Ig Nobel
In 1999, the patent was awarded the Ig Nobel Prize for Managed Health Care. Both Blonskys had been dead for over twenty years by then. The prize ceremony at Harvard featured a brief reading from the patent itself, including the recommended rotation speeds and the dimensions of the catching net.
The patent is now a fixture of medical-ethics curricula and patent-policy seminars. It is often paired with the swing patent and the cat-laser patent as examples of what the USPTO will grant when no prior art has been formally documented in the patent literature itself, regardless of whether the idea would survive contact with practitioners in the relevant field.
The Blonskys themselves seem to have considered the patent a serious contribution to obstetric science. They were, at minimum, the only people in history to have produced a fully engineered set of plans for a machine that no doctor has ever asked them to build.
See the original
The full text and figures of US3216423 — including the spinning turntable, the restraint harness, and the perimeter catching net — are on patents.us.
Related stories
The Patent for Surviving a Fire by Breathing Through the Toilet
In 1982, an inventor received a US patent for a fresh-air breathing device intended for high-rise fires. The device was a snorkel. You inserted it past the water in the toilet bowl and breathed the fresh air drawn down the plumbing's vent stack.
Smucker's Patented the Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich
In 1999, the J.M. Smucker Company received a US patent on a 'Sealed Crustless Sandwich.' For seven years, the company sent cease-and-desist letters to small-town caterers, school lunch programs, and competing sandwich makers, before the patent was finally pulled apart on reexamination.
The Patent on Pointing a Laser at a Cat
In 1995, the USPTO granted Kevin Amiss and Martin Greenstein a patent on the act of exercising a cat by getting it to chase a moving spot of light. The patent was real. The cats did not pay royalties.
The Comb-Over Patent
In 1977, two brothers in Orlando, Florida received a US patent for a method of combing one's hair to disguise baldness. It is among the most-cited examples of why the patent system needed reform — and a winner of the 2004 Ig Nobel Prize.