The Patent for a Machine That Kicks You in the Rear
In 2001, the USPTO granted a patent for a coin-operated amusement device whose entire function is to let a user pay to have a rotating boot kick them in the buttocks. It is real, it is fully illustrated, and it is exactly what it sounds like.
US6293874 was filed on May 8, 2000, and granted on September 25, 2001, to Joe W. Armstrong. The title is "User-Operated Amusement Apparatus for Kicking the User's Buttocks." There is no euphemism in that title and no hidden technical meaning. The patent describes, in full and earnest detail, a machine that kicks the person operating it in the rear end.
The drawings show the apparatus clearly: a vertical column supporting a rotating assembly, around which a series of "kicking shoes" — described in the patent as resembling boots — are mounted on hinged arms. The user positions themselves in front of the device. When activated, the column rotates, swinging the shoes around so that they strike the user's posterior in succession. The patent specifies that the device can be configured as a coin-operated amusement machine.
The claims
The patent's language is a small masterpiece of formal seriousness applied to an absurd object. It explains that the apparatus is intended "for the purpose of self-discipline" or amusement, and describes the mechanism with the same rigor a patent attorney would apply to a turbine. The independent claim describes "a plurality of flexible arms each having a shoe positioned thereon" arranged on "a rotatable hub" such that rotation "causes the shoes to strike the buttocks of a user." There are dependent claims covering variations: the speed of rotation, the number of shoes, the option for the user to control the rotation themselves.
The patent even anticipates the obvious question of why a person would want this, gesturing toward self-punishment, exercise, and entertainment as possible motivations without committing firmly to any of them.
How it gets onto the lists
The buttock-kicking machine is a permanent resident of "strangest patents ever granted" compilations, and it earns its place differently from most entries. It is not a method patent of dubious obviousness, like the comb-over or the cat-laser. It is not an earnest solution to a real problem that happens to look absurd, like the toilet-snorkel fire device. It is a fully mechanical apparatus — a real machine, properly engineered and illustrated — whose entire purpose is silly. The seriousness of the engineering is precisely what makes it funny. Someone drew careful figures of the hinged kicking-shoe assembly. Someone calculated the geometry of the rotating hub. Someone paid the filing fees and prosecuted the application to grant.
There is no evidence the machine was ever manufactured or sold commercially, which places it in the large category of patents that exist purely as documents — granted, recorded, and never built. But unlike most never-built patents, no one particularly laments this one's failure to reach the market.
The patent stands as a reminder of one of the quiet truths of the patent system: novelty and non-obviousness are the legal tests, not usefulness in any sensible sense and certainly not dignity. If a thing is new, and not obvious, and you describe it clearly enough, the office will grant you a patent on it — even if the thing is a machine for kicking yourself in the rear.
See the original
The full text and figures of US6293874 are on patents.us.
Related stories
The Patent for Surviving a Fire by Breathing Through the Toilet
In 1982, an inventor received a US patent for a fresh-air breathing device intended for high-rise fires. The device was a snorkel. You inserted it past the water in the toilet bowl and breathed the fresh air drawn down the plumbing's vent stack.
Smucker's Patented the Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich
In 1999, the J.M. Smucker Company received a US patent on a 'Sealed Crustless Sandwich.' For seven years, the company sent cease-and-desist letters to small-town caterers, school lunch programs, and competing sandwich makers, before the patent was finally pulled apart on reexamination.
The Patent for Birthing a Baby by Centrifugal Force
In 1965, a New York couple named George and Charlotte Blonsky received a US patent for a machine that spun a woman in labor on a rotating turntable, using centrifugal force to deliver the child. They were entirely sincere. They had detailed engineering drawings.
The Patent on Pointing a Laser at a Cat
In 1995, the USPTO granted Kevin Amiss and Martin Greenstein a patent on the act of exercising a cat by getting it to chase a moving spot of light. The patent was real. The cats did not pay royalties.